Archive for October 2011
NaNoWriMo: Taking the Plunge
Yesterday a social-media friend of mine (Hello, Jonathan!) asked me if I was thinking about doing NaNoWriMo this year.
Short answer: Not really.
Long answer: I’ve thought about it in the past but have always said no; I sincerely doubt that I’ll have the time to write 50,000 words in 30 days while working full-time, and I’d rather not start and end up failing.
But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that the idea appealed to me. After all, I did have a bunch of story ideas rattling around in my head, and there was one story in particular where I had even gone so far as to take notes on what the main plot and the complementary subplot would be. Why not go for it?
So yes, I have decided: I will be doing NaNoWriMo.
However, I’m not doing this to prepare a manuscript for publication. I’m going in with a few reasonable assumptions:
- My book will suck.
- My pacing will be off.
- My characters won’t be realistic or three-dimensional.
- My setting will not engage the reader.
- My diction will be poor.
If I’m so convinced my book will be horrible, then why am I doing it? Well, for reasons both personal and professional:
- I want to prove to myself that I have the discipline to complete a novel. I’ve never attempted writing anything as long as 50,000 words (I didn’t need to write a thesis paper to get my BA), and almost every writing resource I’ve read stresses that the most successful writers aren’t necessarily the best or most-skilled – the most successful ones are the ones who don’t stop and keep on hustling. NaNoWriMo provides an excellent platform for this because of the social aspect.
- I feel that writing a novel will make me a better editor. You know that old saying “those who can’t do, teach”? Well, I’m sure a lot of writers out there feel that “those who can’t write, edit”. If I actually take the effort to write a novel and realize how hard it is to do so (creating an engaging plot with believable characters, understandable motivations, evocative settings, and more), I’m sure that my understanding of how to make novels better will also improve. Plus, I’m sure I will be more tactful in my comments and critiques to the writers I end up working with.
- I feel that there is a good novel in me somewhere. I have lots of stories in my head that I want to develop further in text. But I want to give each story the attention and skill it deserves. I figure that if my first novel is something that I’m not too worked up about (remember, I’m assuming that this first novel will suck due to inexperience), I’ll feel more confident when I start subsequent projects. I’d rather not ruin a really amazing idea with bad execution when I can wait and really do it well once I have more practice.
In the meantime, I’m trying to gather up more resources about writing build up a cushion of support and encouragement. So far, I’m focusing on StoryFix and the I Should Be Writing podcast by Mur Lafferty. What writing resources do you have to share? Let me know in the comments.
Cookbooks: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Note: This was originally written as a guest post for Rachael Stephen of Mythic Flux, a blogger who talks about writing and cooking. This post was originally published on her blog on September 26th, and has been re-posted with her permission.
Rachael writes a lot on here about writing, and she writes a lot on here about food. So, in the interest of picking some very low-hanging but interesting fruit, I’m going to discuss a way in which the two intersect: cookbooks!
They’re a staple of any kitchen, and if they’re any good, they inevitably get rippled and covered in stains. So, if I went into someone’s kitchen and saw a roughed-up cookbook – stains, grease spots, cracked spines, notes in the margin – I would immediately think that book’s a keeper.
Unfortunately, the vast majority of cookbooks out there (even several in my kitchen!) do not meet this lofty standard. So, in the interest of sparing future chefs some heartache, I’m going to tell you about some of the thngs that I love – and loathe – seeing in cookbooks.
Bad: Sloppy, incomplete indexes
Ooh, does this one ever get me riled up. A lot of the time, when I want to cook something, it’s because I’m craving a certain ingredient or flavour. Most cookbooks don’t organize their chapters on the main ingredients of each recipe, so where do I turn to instead if I want a recipe that contains, say, cumin? The index! Yet, so many cookbook indexes contain, at best, only a rudimentary outline of the recipes inside. For example, I have a Rachael Ray cookbook that contains a wonderful recipe for corn and black bean stew with chicken and chipotle peppers. The ingredients include 1 tbsp of cumin and the juice of 1 lime. Yet if I look in the index, the “C” and “L” headings contain no listing for “cumin” or “lime” at all – in fact, the very last word listed underneath “L” is “lasagna” – not very far down the alphabet, is it?
To get an idea of what a truly excellent cookbook index should be like, check out the cookbooks released by Janet and Greta Podleski. Not only are their recipes healthy, but almost every ingredient of every single recipe is cross-referenced in the index. On top of that, non-recipe information about health provided in the sidebars of their recipes is also included in the index. I cannot stress enough how good their indexes are, and wish more cookbooks would follow their example.
[Another note: I just noticed today that the Podleski sisters are releasing a new cookbook this November, and it looks like it will be a door-stopping doozy. Yippee!]
Good: Binder or coil-style binding that allows me to lay the book flat on the table
Have you ever had to weigh down a cookbook with cans and heavy potatoes just so that it could lie flat enough for you to read while you were cooking the damned recipe on the stove? It’s frustrating. I just want to be able to let my veggies fry in the pot on the stove, and then mosey over to the kitchen table so I can see what ingredients I have to add next. Is that so much to ask? Publishers, why do you insist on giving perfect binding to all of your cookbooks? I need to be able to read the book without touching it because my hands are wet and dripping!
Bad: Recipes that involve lots of time-intensive preparation before you start cooking
One particularly egregious offender of this rule is the cookbook Deceptively Delicious by Jessica Seinfeld. The cookbook’s main gimmick is that you can get fussy kids to eat healthily if you sneak pureed fruits and vegetables into their favourite meals. However, this means, you know, actually pureeing and storing said veggies ahead of cooking the meal itself. Ms. Seinfeld sets aside Sunday evenings every week to make enough purees to include in her recipes. She says that it takes her only an hour to make all the purees she needs, but I sincerely doubt that it would take under an hour to roast a whole butternut squash before you even start peeling and pureeing the damned thing – and you have to let it cool first anyways.
Please note that this doesn’t mean that all meals that require preparation before you cook are bad. I’m totally fine with marinating something overnight before you cook it. But the point is that the effort you put in ahead of time should be minimal and lead to great flavour.
Good: Recipes that allow for the inventive use of leftovers
I like using the slow cooker, especially when my mom is travelling and I have to make meals for my partner and I while she is away, which is why I love, love, love a particular cookbook called Cook Once Eat Twice. Each 2-page spread in the book contains 2 recipes. On the left-hand side is the slow cooker recipe; since slow cookers can cook a lot, the recipe explicitly states how much of the finished product to set aside for leftovers. And here’s the brilliant thing – the right-hand side of the spread contains a recipe that allows you to use those leftovers in a completely new way! For example, the leftovers from “Creamy Basil Chicken” are then recycled into “Chicken and Wild Rice Chowder.” I really appreciate cooking that allows me to be versatile.
Bad: Recipes that are lazy or uninventive
Several years ago I got a cookbook on heart-healthy cooking. Its big selling point on the cover was that it had over 700 recipes. So far, so good, you’re thinking. But I swear to god, the cookbook contains this following recipe:
Quick microwave chicken
Ingredients:
- 2 whole chicken breasts, skinned, boned, and halved
Instructions:
Place chicken in a glass pie plate, placing larger pieces to the outside of dish. Cover with plastic wrap; prick a hole in the plastic for steam to escape. Cook at full power 8 minutes; turn. Rearrange pieces in dish; cook 6 minutes longer, or until done.
That’s it. Even if you don’t eat meat, you have to admit that this is a half-assed way to cook chicken. This single recipe is why I have not used this cookbook in 5 years.
Please note that this is not an exhaustive list by far – as someone who’s learned about what goes into creating books, there are all sorts of pet peeves I could tell you about. But these are things that heavily influence how often I use a cookbook in my own kitchen.
A Thanksgiving post: Thanks to my teachers
It’s Thanksgiving today in Canada, so in the spirit of the holiday, I want to give thanks to some very important but under-appreciated people: My teachers.
Well, three teachers in particular. After reading this post on the most important lessons a teacher ever taught you, I decided to talk about some of the most valuable lessons my teachers ever taught me, whether they were part of the official curricula or not.
Mr Shearer and the poetry of essays
Mr. Shearer taught me Grade 12 English. I had only heard of him before he became my teacher, but after I met him, I realized that it was sheer luck that assigned me to his class: Originally, I was part of a different class but had to switch due to a scheduling conflict. His greatest lesson to me was about the literary value and potential inherent in essays.
Prior instruction on essays in English class focused on the “hamburger” model: One paragraph for your thesis (the top bun), one paragraph each for your three supporting arguments (the meat), and one paragraph for your conclusion (the bottom bun). Of course, each paragraph had to follow the hamburger model itself and have an introductory sentence, three sentences of juicy argument, and a concluding sentence. In the minds of those teachers, sentences and paragraphs were things that could be assembled like clockwork.
As you can imagine, this led to dull essays with only average grades; my teachers often said that I didn’t address the topic clearly enough.
This changed when Mr. Shearer gave each student in the class a small paperback containing several essays and told us to open the book to one about the growth of public apathy titled “Who Cares?”† He then proceeded to read it aloud to us, pausing to deconstruct how the author stated his thesis, built his argument, and used rhetorical devices to grab the reader.
This lesson (or series of lessons – I seem to recall that Mr. Shearer took his time) was no less than a revelation. Before this, thesis statements were bald, bare things: “[Object X] is a major theme in [Story Y].” But here was a thesis relevant to real life argued in an organic, persuasive manner. Here was an essay that marshalled pieces of evidence from numerous fields to prove its point. Here was an author whose essays weren’t hamburgers; they were steaks.
The crux of this lesson hinged on one sentence: “He stabbed her.” At this point in the essay, the author was describing the murder of Kitty Genovese, and what it illustrated about the apathy of the modern-day citizen. Mr. Shearer took the time to note that this sentence was quick and violent – like a stab itself – and punctuated this with a turning thrust of his fist.
“He stabbed her.”
That’s when I realized that sentences and paragraphs didn’t need to be built like clockwork anymore.
Later on that year, Mr. Shearer took us through Hamlet and Brave New World. However, my time with him was short. He was diagnosed with cancer during the school year and replaced by a supply teacher. The following school year he was in and out of class, replaced by a battery of teachers, until he died in the spring of 2003 a few months before I graduated.
I think the shortness of our teacher-student relationship has contributed to that lesson on essays remaining so vivid. Whatever the reason, Mr. Shearer, thank you.
An interesting side note: I think I can also thank Mr. Shearer for my interest in Roman history. One day in class, he mentioned that “I, Claudius” was one of his favourite shows. I had no idea what “I, Claudius” was about for several years, but knew that I wanted to see it based solely on his endorsement. When I eventually found out that it was about the beginning of the Roman Empire, and found out about the “History of Rome” podcast around the same time, I knew that Roman history was something I wanted to dig into more deeply.
† Research has led me to believe that the essay “Who Cares?” was originally written by John Leonard for The Nation in 1979 and then republished in his book Private Lives in the Imperial City. I have yet to confirm this as I can’t find a full-text copy of the essay online.
Mr. Flahiff and the art of caring
Let’s put it this way: How many high school teachers can you think of who have a legitimate fan page on Facebook?
Mr. Flahiff can’t be pinned down to a year or a class like the other two teachers. When I was in high school, he taught art, and his classroom was located in the Music Hall, my school’s semi-autonomous nerd enclave. You know what I mean: The sort of place where music kids, drama kids, RPG-playing kids, and even the occasional stoner hung out – and this was before “Glee” made singing in school choirs cool.
Mr. Flahiff was the unofficial Den Father for all of us. He always kept his door open, even during his classes, and would allow students from the hall to wander in, talk to him, and talk to his students. He would let us listen to his lessons. He would let us eat lunch in his classroom, or hang out there after the school day was over. He was the quintessential Awesome Teacher (and like many Awesome Teachers, he butted heads with the school administration, but that’s another story for another day).
Most importantly, Mr. Flahiff listened to his students and gave them a supporting ear whenever they had problems related to their classes or their homelives. This meant a lot to me and to a host of other students (many of whom are now “Fans of Flahiff” – seriously, you should check the Facebook page out).
He is now semi-retired, but this doesn’t mean that he’s drifted away from his students. Even now, I see him at birthday parties for my friends. Hell, I invited him to my 25th birthday party, and he so impressed some of the other people there that they joined his Facebook group upon only a few hours’ acquaintance!
It’s hard to name the lesson he taught, because so much of my interaction with him was outside of the classroom. It’s simple, though: we learned that a teacher could move beyond caring about us as students and start caring about us as people.
One last note: Mr. Flahiff and Mr. Shearer were very good friends. When I took Mr. Shearer’s philosophy class in my final year of high school, Mr. Flahiff was one of the teachers brought in to take over for him when his health failed. If you think about it, they were a Tag-Team of Teaching Awesomeness.
Mrs. Anderson and the perils of credit cards
Of the three teachers, Mrs. Anderson retains the most mystery. Mr. Shearer died 8 1/2 years ago and Mr. Flahiff is on Facebook, constantly in touch with his legions of students and friends. But after Grade 6 ended and I moved on to a different school, I visited Mrs. Anderson only once in our old classroom. Her most valuable lesson was off-the-cuff and definitely not part of the traditional curriculum, but out of the three teachers listed here, her lesson has been the most tangible.
She taught us how credit cards work and how credit card companies make money.
I have no recollection of what spurred this impromptu lesson, but I do remember her taking up her usual spot on the big chair in the carpeted corner of the room and us sitting around her feet. She proceeded to explain how people used credit cards, and how credit card companies charged interest on purchases. She then explained that credit card companies offered a “minimum payment” option, but that interest still accrued on the remaining balance – and that if you kept on paying the minimum payment, the interest would keep on accruing, ultimately costing you more than the purchase itself.
Perhaps this handy infographic will show you what I mean.
This knowledge wasn’t useful when I was 12, but I kept it socked away as I grew up. I didn’t get my first credit card until I was almost 21. Since then, I have tried my hardest to pay off the complete balance month after month, even while paying for all of my Ryerson courses out-of-pocket without any loans, grants, or bursaries. I’m proud to say that I don’t have any credit card debt.
Two nights ago I decided to try to find Mrs. Anderson. I took a look at my old report cards to learn her first initials, and used some educated guesses about her name and location to find her on Google. I saw one very promising website with more information, and sent an email to the address listed on that page. I don’t know what sort of response I’ll get, or even if I’ll get one at all. I’m not even entirely convinced that I’ve found her. But if it does turn out to be her, I just want to let her know: Thank you.
Holy crap. Just, HOLY CRAP.
Well, it appears that this post will be the third in a loooooong series of library-contest-themed posts. I found out a few days ago (almost 2 weeks after I was told that I won) which author I’ll be having lunch with.
Margaret Atwood.
Margaret freaking Atwood.
I was also told the following upon further request:
- The lunch itself will happen about 2 months away in early December
- I can bring books for her to sign
- I can write about the lunch event anywhere I want.
My plan is to see if I can pitch this into a feature-length article somewhere. Of course, I will have to read a lot of her books to get up to speed in the meantime. And, oh look, I now have a Goodreads account. I’m open to new suggestions for my “to-read” list.




